<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Ikonograph</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>The Image is Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:57:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The gospel according to Habakkuk. by barrydean</title>
		<link>http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/2008/12/29/the-gospel-according-to-habakkuk/#comment-3240</link>
		<dc:creator>barrydean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/?p=366#comment-3240</guid>
		<description>Ditto to what Erik said above. Are you shooting for a year of sabbatical? Are you blogging anywhere? Miss your perspective dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto to what Erik said above. Are you shooting for a year of sabbatical? Are you blogging anywhere? Miss your perspective dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The definition of madness is&#8230; by The Ikonographer</title>
		<link>http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/2007/01/10/the-definition-of-madness-is/#comment-3238</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ikonographer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/2007/01/10/the-definition-of-madness-is/#comment-3238</guid>
		<description>OK OK. I give! I misquoted. But my application was correct. More of a mis-type. Note that the post has been corrected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK OK. I give! I misquoted. But my application was correct. More of a mis-type. Note that the post has been corrected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Heath Ledger&#8217;s Joker is the Sanest Man in Gotham by Adam</title>
		<link>http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/2008/08/03/heath-ledgers-joker-crazy-like-a-fox/#comment-3237</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 20:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/?p=276#comment-3237</guid>
		<description>wow, a very good intepretation, i also find that the joker reflects our society today, and his murdering and violent crimes are representative of the moral crimes that happen in our society. Even though his crimes are explicit and are deemed unacceptable in which they are, it shows the hidden crimes that are just as bad in our world, such as discrimination and racism</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, a very good intepretation, i also find that the joker reflects our society today, and his murdering and violent crimes are representative of the moral crimes that happen in our society. Even though his crimes are explicit and are deemed unacceptable in which they are, it shows the hidden crimes that are just as bad in our world, such as discrimination and racism</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The definition of madness is&#8230; by Joaquim</title>
		<link>http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/2007/01/10/the-definition-of-madness-is/#comment-3236</link>
		<dc:creator>Joaquim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/2007/01/10/the-definition-of-madness-is/#comment-3236</guid>
		<description>The quote is: &quot;Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.&quot;
and its attributed to Albert Einstein</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The quote is: &#8220;Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.&#8221;<br />
and its attributed to Albert Einstein</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Toward a Christian perspective on art by Junebug</title>
		<link>http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/2008/01/22/toward-a-christian-perspective-on-art/#comment-3235</link>
		<dc:creator>Junebug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 23:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/2008/01/22/toward-a-christian-perspective-on-art/#comment-3235</guid>
		<description>Well said.  Really well said.  

While I have never committed murder, a film may help me get inside the mind of one who has done so. I may abhor it, but I still understand what the murderer was thinking, what motivated them. Really, art accomplishes a direct line of understanding (not approval, mind you) between two people that have never met.

I feel this way (esp. about films) all the time.  That is why they can wreak havoc with my emotions.  Because I can identify with their human-ness, and the with the possiblity that I am capable to doing something equally heinous if given the &quot;push&quot; which you suggested when you reviewed &quot;The Dark Knight.&quot;

Another excerpt which helped me:

Out of this I build an important idea: good art must not be equated with moral art. In my opinion, art is good when it effectively communicates. It may communicate something immoral, but morality is not the issue. Communication, empathy is the issue.

In this sense, it’s better not to use the words “good” or “bad” in reference to art. I think that the better word is “effective.” this word carries the sense of function apart from morality.

I&#039;d been wondering what art (mine in particular) was really worth.  Now, your thoughts have given me a springboard to begin to estimate that.

When you said this, you were right on:

Just because you can doesn’t mean you should (1 Cor 10:23). 
What we consider the exercise of liberty can actually be sin (Gal 5:13). You must examine your motives for consuming art. 
Remember that your sinful hearts seek to use art as an occasion for sin. Guard against this. Even pornography is art. It is absolutely immoral. There is no provision for viewing this kind of art because it invites the heart to spiritual and literal adultery (Matt 5:28).

I have been convicted by the Holy Spirit to forego certain films, books, and genres of films and books.  You put into words the reasons why I do this.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said.  Really well said.  </p>
<p>While I have never committed murder, a film may help me get inside the mind of one who has done so. I may abhor it, but I still understand what the murderer was thinking, what motivated them. Really, art accomplishes a direct line of understanding (not approval, mind you) between two people that have never met.</p>
<p>I feel this way (esp. about films) all the time.  That is why they can wreak havoc with my emotions.  Because I can identify with their human-ness, and the with the possiblity that I am capable to doing something equally heinous if given the &#8220;push&#8221; which you suggested when you reviewed &#8220;The Dark Knight.&#8221;</p>
<p>Another excerpt which helped me:</p>
<p>Out of this I build an important idea: good art must not be equated with moral art. In my opinion, art is good when it effectively communicates. It may communicate something immoral, but morality is not the issue. Communication, empathy is the issue.</p>
<p>In this sense, it’s better not to use the words “good” or “bad” in reference to art. I think that the better word is “effective.” this word carries the sense of function apart from morality.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d been wondering what art (mine in particular) was really worth.  Now, your thoughts have given me a springboard to begin to estimate that.</p>
<p>When you said this, you were right on:</p>
<p>Just because you can doesn’t mean you should (1 Cor 10:23).<br />
What we consider the exercise of liberty can actually be sin (Gal 5:13). You must examine your motives for consuming art.<br />
Remember that your sinful hearts seek to use art as an occasion for sin. Guard against this. Even pornography is art. It is absolutely immoral. There is no provision for viewing this kind of art because it invites the heart to spiritual and literal adultery (Matt 5:28).</p>
<p>I have been convicted by the Holy Spirit to forego certain films, books, and genres of films and books.  You put into words the reasons why I do this.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Heath Ledger&#8217;s Joker is the Sanest Man in Gotham by Junebug</title>
		<link>http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/2008/08/03/heath-ledgers-joker-crazy-like-a-fox/#comment-3234</link>
		<dc:creator>Junebug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 23:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/?p=276#comment-3234</guid>
		<description>I like the way you explained who the Joker was in this movie.  I  like the points you made.  I will look at your posting how how to view art, because I am an artist, and I am very interested in making good art.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the way you explained who the Joker was in this movie.  I  like the points you made.  I will look at your posting how how to view art, because I am an artist, and I am very interested in making good art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Testament? What&#8217;s wrong with the OLD one? by Kent</title>
		<link>http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/2007/06/07/new-testament-whats-wrong-with-the-old-one/#comment-3232</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 23:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/2007/06/07/new-testament-whats-wrong-with-the-old-one/#comment-3232</guid>
		<description>Have you seen the new electronic edition of Benware&#039;s Survey of the Old Testament and Survey of the New Testament? These volumes are available as part of the Everyman&#039;s Bible Commentary Series (44 Vols.), currently available for pre-order from Logos Bible Software. I thought you might be interested: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.logos.com/products/prepub/details/5148&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Everyman&#039;s Bible Commentary Series (44 Vols.)&lt;/A&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you seen the new electronic edition of Benware&#8217;s Survey of the Old Testament and Survey of the New Testament? These volumes are available as part of the Everyman&#8217;s Bible Commentary Series (44 Vols.), currently available for pre-order from Logos Bible Software. I thought you might be interested: <a href="http://www.logos.com/products/prepub/details/5148" rel="nofollow">Everyman&#8217;s Bible Commentary Series (44 Vols.)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The definition of madness is&#8230; by Geoff M</title>
		<link>http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/2007/01/10/the-definition-of-madness-is/#comment-3231</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 07:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/2007/01/10/the-definition-of-madness-is/#comment-3231</guid>
		<description>You say &quot;the definition of madness is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting the same results&quot;.

Actually it is the opposite. Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.

thats why, for example, socialists and liberals keep &quot;reinventing&quot; the same failed policies and impose them with an expectation that the outcome will be different &quot;this time&quot;.

If something doesn&#039;t work you need to look at the outcome, analyse the result, consider the new options and possible outcomes and amend your next attempt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You say &#8220;the definition of madness is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting the same results&#8221;.</p>
<p>Actually it is the opposite. Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.</p>
<p>thats why, for example, socialists and liberals keep &#8220;reinventing&#8221; the same failed policies and impose them with an expectation that the outcome will be different &#8220;this time&#8221;.</p>
<p>If something doesn&#8217;t work you need to look at the outcome, analyse the result, consider the new options and possible outcomes and amend your next attempt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The definition of madness is&#8230; by Bex</title>
		<link>http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/2007/01/10/the-definition-of-madness-is/#comment-3227</link>
		<dc:creator>Bex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/2007/01/10/the-definition-of-madness-is/#comment-3227</guid>
		<description>Brilliant blog, thank you.  I&#039;m a little outta date here, but I just had to flag up your opening quote: that definition of madness is doing the same thing over and over while expecting a DIFFERENT result.

Hope the cable issue has been resolved now! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brilliant blog, thank you.  I&#8217;m a little outta date here, but I just had to flag up your opening quote: that definition of madness is doing the same thing over and over while expecting a DIFFERENT result.</p>
<p>Hope the cable issue has been resolved now! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The gospel according to Habakkuk. by Erik Raymond</title>
		<link>http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/2008/12/29/the-gospel-according-to-habakkuk/#comment-3224</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik Raymond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theimageiseverything.wordpress.com/?p=366#comment-3224</guid>
		<description>dude, we flipped the calendar, its now 2009, some folks are still blogging and stuff, feel free to join in the fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dude, we flipped the calendar, its now 2009, some folks are still blogging and stuff, feel free to join in the fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
